• Natural Gas News

    LNG Supplies at Risk from Renewables: WoodMac

Summary

About three-quarters of new LNG supplies are at risk from increased investments in renewables and energy storage in the power sector.

by: Shardul Sharma

Posted in:

Natural Gas & LNG News, World, Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), Security of Supply, Energy Transition, Renewables, News By Country, Australia, Canada, Mozambique, Qatar, United States

LNG Supplies at Risk from Renewables: WoodMac

Wood Mackenzie in a report published on December 9 said that over three-quarters of new LNG supplies were at risk under the Paris Agreement's 2-degree scenario. Gas demand would come under pressure from increased investments in renewables and energy storage in the power sector, as well as efficiency improvements and adoption of new technologies in non-power sectors.  

According to WoodMac, in a 2-degree world, green hydrogen becomes a game-changer in the long-term, emerging as a key competitor to gas consumption towards the end of 2040 and achieving a 10% share in the total primary energy demand by 2050. 

 "With weaker global gas demand, the space for new developments will be limited. This is a significant challenge for companies considering FID [final investment decision] on new projects,” Wood Mackenzie principal analyst Kateryna Filippenko said. "In a 2-degree world, only about 145bn m3/year of additional LNG supply is needed in 2040 compared to 450 bn m3/year in our base case outlook. And if we consider imminent FID for Qatar North Field East expansion, the space for new projects shrinks to 104bn m3/year, down 77% from our base case." 

Low-cost LNG suppliers Russia and Qatar are expected to be front-runners to fill the modest supply gap, while low Henry Hub prices would also mean competitive US LNG projects, WoodMac said. But as Qatar and Russia pursue monetisation of their low-cost resource base, and LNG demand starts declining post 2035, the strategic rationale for others to invest becomes questionable.  

Wood Mackenzie's Global Gas Model suggests that in a 2-degree scenario, only a few Australian backfill projects will go ahead, pushing the country down the list of top LNG exporters, while an expansion of Canadian and Mozambique LNG capacities is unlikely to materialise. As LNG demand starts declining post 2035, US LNG underutilisation will be required to balance the market, similar to what has happened in 2020, it said.  

"LNG developers will have a difficult decision to make. On the one hand, there will be windows of opportunities for investment decisions,” Wood Mackenzie research analyst Evgeniya Mezentseva said. “But on the other hand, the long-term value of these investments might be at risk by the prospects of a shrinking market space combined with competitive pressure from lower-cost producers." 

The category of projects most affected under a 2-degree pathway are discovered pre-FID developments. In 2040, production from these projects is expected to be about 1,300bn m3 less compared to the base case outlook. Low prices could wipe out any new investment in more economically challenging projects, and only the most cost-efficient and flexible ones will survive.  

"Compared to our base case, the 2-degree scenario will leave about 12 trillion m3 of discovered gas resources stranded. This is more than three times the amount of gas produced globally in 2020,” Filippenko said. "Most of this will be in the US, Russia and the Middle East. These regions will face decreasing export opportunities for their vast gas resources in addition to lower domestic demand for gas."